'Can a Christian justify the use of Nuclear Weapons? Essay\r'

'When answering the title of this essay, you have to origin olfactory property at why countries declare and develop thermo atomic weapons. The first occasion and most unadorned of all is to give the atomic device to destroy an enemy. A tidy Christian however can neer discharge this, beca accustom no matter how accurate your weapons are you volition undoubtedly kill innocent civilians. If you look at the Ten Commandments laid down by paragon you will test that God was opposed to war, madness and every(prenominal) form of mistreatment. We are told, â€Å"To love thy neighbour” and â€Å"To treat our enemies, as we would want to be treated.\r\n” If you were to look at these commandments you would see that nuclear warfare could neer be scarcelyified and if you do provoke a nuclear war you should be punished. That brings me into the second reason of why countries uphold nuclear weapons and that is as a threat. It is a way of sheltering your country, but you will protect yourself and retaliate if provoked. Any Christian would touch sensation that this was unjust, after all God did say in the Ten Commandments, â€Å"Forgive your enemy”. Retaliating in any way, shape or form would be severance the Ten Commandments and therefore you could not call yourself a good Christian.\r\nThat leads me onto the third reason of why countries retain nuclear bombs that is to consumption it as a encumbrance to any unity who may consider attacking the country. Many Christians conceptualize that retain nuclear bombs just for the use, as a deterrent, is ridiculous. They get hold that there is no point in spending millions of pounds on producing nuclear weapons just for the use as a threat. It is difficult to imagine that bulk find it acceptable that 75,000 to 100,000 die unnecessarily every day from lack of food, water, shelter, sanitation etc (not from war) while the institution’s most privileged governments pour crimson more bill ions into ‘security.\r\n‘ I agree with them, and I find oneself that there are far more principal(prenominal) things throughout the world that need our help similar those listed above. Spending huge amounts on developing nuclear weapons is very unnecessary and the property should be aimed at ending death and pain rather than creating it. However, it is not only Christians that believe retaining nuclear bombs, as a deterrent, is wrong and that dropping nuclear bombs is unjust.\r\nI asked jurisprudence Michael Evans (A priest at my local Roman Catholic Parish) and he said the go alonging, â€Å"Nuclear deterrence as a national policy must be condemned as morally abhorrent because it is the excuse and plea for the continued possession and further development of these horrific weapons. We urge all to join in fetching up the challenge to begin the effort to bring off nuclear weapons now, rather than relying on them indefinitely. ” You can see that take down in other religions the retention of nuclear weapons, as a deterrent is believed to be unjust, even though it may have a sylphlike chance of preventing war.\r\nThen there is the saying from a 4th Century Roman Christian who said, â€Å"let him who desires peace, prepare for war. ” He was saying that if anyone wants peace, must protect themselves as a deterrent from potential attackers. tho who is to say that nuclear weapons that are being use as a deterrent will neer be used to destroy an enemy create pain and death to a population. The most obvious approach a Christian would take to nuclear warfare would be the unilateral approach. That is never to retain nuclear weapons and certainly never to use them.\r\nThis would be the most just way, because you can spend money on things that are important like health, grooming and transport. By not retaining nuclear arms, no one would try to attack you, because they would not find you as a threat. But of course you can never rid ev eryone of knowledge. Therefore any one somebody could have the know how to design and manufacture nuclear bombs for use of a destructive nature. I feel that the forth approach is the best and most just way of using nuclear weapons- not to use them at all. You are not threatening anyone, you follow all of the Ten Commandments and you follow the Just fight Theory.\r\n'