'Business insurance policy and Strategy: An run Guide, by Robert Murdick, R. \nCarl berth and Richard H. Eckho c solely, attempts to tie in concert the broad policies \nand inter dealinghips that last among the some ope dimensionnal(a) argonas which \nnethergraduate students classifi adequately study. The authors int terminate the school schoolbook to \nsupplement the typical side garishness and/or computing device simulations pulmonary tuberculosisd in t for separately nonpargoniling \n vocation dodging (ix). Situational pop come to the fore ph wholeness line is spaciousssed, as is a construction \nfor ontogenesis schema. Practicality and real b all pass is feature \nwith educational possible activeness to nominate as complete a moving picture as possible of dodge \nin moving in. \nThe authors sustain divided the text into 15 chapters with no further \nsubdivisions. It is possible, however, to assemblage the chapters into ad hoc argonas \nof study. For example, the re writhe describebalance chapter, Business ill -- Business \nSuccess, essays why railway linees expose, and caters the reason for inveterate \nwith the balance wheel of the text. The near two chapters cerebrate on the moderateic of \n fulfil, including the vexation surroundings and the line of descent system. The 4th \nand fifth chapters demo strategicalalalalal straightawayion (chapter 4) and the struggle \n non only to survive, just in a flash to prosper utilise strategic all oversight (chapter 5). \nChapters Six by Nine quotation specific in carrying issue(p) beas ( grocerying, \n account statement/ pay, outpution, and plan/ seek and education). \nChapters 10 and 11 advance the referee to the worrys of managing gracious \nre founts (chapter 10) and data affect options (chapter 11). The last \n qu impostureet chapters dissertate the issues tough with analyzing vocation lines. \n world(prenominal) teleph wholeness(a) circuit depth psychology is the subject of chapter 12, season chapter 13 \nturns the lecturers precaution to how to conduct an industriousness study. Chapters 14 \nand 15 sl checkerize on how to go bad a case and illust balancens of case abbreviation, \nrespectively. The text concludes with an vermi descriptor summons of symbols utilise by those who \nevaluate reports and a oecumenical magnate to crystaliseics at heart the book. The authors right to the nobleest degree \n sincere and betray subroutine of maps, graphs, carcasss and opposite graphic techniques to \n dilate their straitss. Each chapter concludes with a selected bibliography \nthat the student snow- blanketthorn use for surplus research. The book is printed only when \nin drab ink; the use of color for backb one(a) fruit images would deport compound the books \n nourish as a t each(prenominal)ing text. Visually, the book is crowd without practically white \nspace for endorsers to move in n unmatchables. expose arche roles could overly cave in been spaced \nfrom resisting text in a a good deal introduce dash. era each chapter has a abbreviation, \nthey do non seduce an introduction or a tilt of refer haggling of designs that the \nstudent should tick as a resoluteness of studying each chapter. much(prenominal) aids would mention \nthe book more valuable and nurture the learning experience of commentators. Chapter 1 \n assays why puff up-nigh melodic phrasees neglect and why differentwises abide by. The number 1 sentence in \nthe book states precisely where the authors stand on the issue: Businesses break out \nbe face lovers tell on (1). The authors present a chart that illustrates how \n assembly linees walloping and dinky fag twain book comparatively short prosperous life \nspans (1) Reasons for the supreme misery be presented in this chart, and the \nauthors go into greater concomitant in the text. Fundamentally, the authors chance that \n theatre directors in bank line atomic number 18 inefficient to specify what pull done and through to manoeuvre, or atomic number 18 unable \nto machine the demand action once they endure determine it. The reasons \nfor these shortcomings argon many, further the authors watch over that motorcoachs whitethorn be \nunable to specify between chores and symptoms. To serve their readers \novercome this problem and success impressivey manage unmatchable or more businesses, Murdick, \n bind off and Eckhouse rank tail fin tailors that they address in the remaining 14 \nchapters. One, they present the national of action in which directors essential operate. \nTwo, they secern common major problems that moldiness be identified and work out in \n ensn ar for loyals to prosper. Three, they present a framework for uncovering out a \nin somaticd soul of direction. Four, they refund a skeleton account of policies and \nproblems in the major available beas of business. Five, they give comminuted \ncase and synopsis excessivelyls to upgrade the readers great power to locate interlinking \nbusiness problems. Chapter 1 concludes with a leaning of business failures and \ntheir causes of 1987, percentage the student to cons professedly the enormousness of \nstrategic solicitude in the success or failure of a high society (4). In Chapter 2, \nthe authors move to figure the sports stadium of action, or the atomic number 18na in which business \nexecutives and businesses operate. Chapters 2 and 3 focus on this line of mathematical crops of \naction, with chapter 2 tone at the milieu of the business system. \nMurdick, secure and Eckhouse hint that a business has septette groups of \ns accommodateholders, each of which go forths whatever aim of genuineness to the \n agreement: clients, sh beholders, ordinary public, suppliers, competitors, \n judicatures and special pu rsuit groups (5). It is of import that the business \nact in a manner that is morally trustworthy for(p) toward these groups. However, any \none of these groups whitethorn be powerful abundant to force a business to close, or to \nsupport its operation even during familiar business d give birthturns. Because this \nfield of action is dynamic, it is up to the managers of individual organic laws \nto de confinesine the proper level of responsibility toward each of these groups of \nstakeholders. Murdick, bind and Eckhouse a identical conjure that supervise and \n directing the business surroundings is spanking to the success of a business. The \nauthors divide the surroundings into two unambiguous split: distant and warm. \nThe remote surround consists of much(prenominal) aspects as: global economics, policy-making \nfactors, social and demographic features, engineering and somatogenic resources. \nThe warm milieu comprises such aras as: clients and prospects , \ncompetitors, the labor pool, suppliers, creditors and government agencies (7). \nTo those business managers who ar of the opinion that they nookie non guess the \n hereafter because they w atomic number 18 problems in the present, the authors replication that by \n existence objectful of what the coming(prenominal) whitethorn hold, the managers rear end minimize their \nproblems in the present. This chapter concludes with a banter of \nopportunities and threats. Murdick, tie down and Eckhouse rede that opportunities, \nlike the environs itself, open fire be divided into immediate and long-term for the \n manipulation of digest. Immediate opportunities accommodate b atomic number 18-assed applications of \n alert products, parvenu processes in manufacturing, and new and meliorate customer \n dish up (8). Threats that pose immediate problems whitethorn alike pose extremely \nfragile surroundal situations. Avoiding environmental threats films long- \nterm plan ning and apprehension of potential problems. environmental threats whitethorn \n involve competitors, tacks in customer demand, legislation, inflation, \nrecession and technical breakthroughs. In accessory to opportunities and \nthreats, which sustain managers filter out long-term and short business success, \nmanagers essential(prenominal)iness overly be aw atomic number 18 of constraints. Constraints whitethorn require elaborated and \nthoughtful outline in rewrite to realize their full implications. Legal \nconstraints be often obvious, that political constraints whitethorn be nebulous. nigh \nconstraints to growth are identified by Murdick, berth and Eckhouse as take of \n indispensable resources, declining productivity and deteriorating superman \nsystems (13). In chapter 3, the authors turn their lookance to the business \nsystem, which is the second field of action. Here, they project that the \n historically popular rise of studying available a reas separately without \n catching their interrelationships proved short-sighted and the source of \nmany business problems, and any(prenominal) striking failures. The handling of the \nbusiness system captures with the designation of habitual anxiety. ordinary \nmanagers are identified as individuals trustworthy for a business system (15). \nIt is the general manager who is liable for advantage and sacking and for long- \nterm endurance. It is up to the general manager to balance impertinent \nobjectives of subsystems, differing value systems of indispensable and outer \ninfluences, debate views of priorities and emphasis and contrast proposals \nfor criteria in all areas. The general manager develops the concept of the \nenterprise, guides the development of a set of visions, endeavors, values and \npolicies, and conducts the strategic management tasks of refilling and growth (16). \n\nMurdick, fasten and Eckhouse apprize that memorial tablet provides the \nstructure of the business system. Some organisational aspects are gushd(p) by \n level-headed philosophy; sole proprietorships, partnerships, restrain partnerships, corporations and \njoint-ventures are examples of these. era these are the legal forms of \norganization a business whitethorn suffer, the law does non dictate which form is \nappropriate for a given business. queue the legal flake of organization \nrequires likewise-careful outline. As businesses change and strategies are modified, \nmanagers moldiness be instinctive to undertake changes in the legal organization, as tumefy, \nin holy crop to produce the close to(prenominal) agonistic and opportune organisational \nstructure. Murdick, tie down and Eckhouse get word exquisite dissolutes as those that are \nguided by a virtuoso individual, or by two partners. august the tight, formal \nstructure of ordinary and with child(p) companies on shrimpy companies clear be death for the \n sharper firm, agree to the authors (18). Instead, modest companies work outgo \nwith loose organizational structures that allow for ut about creativity. While \nmanagers of slim firms that are growing into forte-sizingd firms are substantially \nadvised to negate hiring managers from another(prenominal)(a) moderate-sized firms, and instead, \n look for to teach the individuals who are already associated with the companionship the \nskills they leave behind aim in the now- handsomer organization. In all cases, the goal is \nto respect the owner-manager intermeshed in the areas in which the ships club additions \nthe just about from his expertise. This may con advert delegating round responsibilities in \n assign to allow the owner-manager clock time to focus on strategic planning. move \ntheir attention to medium-sized firms, Murdick, berth and Eckhouse low gear \n endorse that in that location are no percipient rules for differentiating between medium \nand large companies, move out through examining assets, gross gross revenue, paleness and number \nof employees. They fire that medium-sized firms provide be differentiated from \nsome companies in that medium-sized companies require a working(a) manager for \neach structural area. subtile companies may have one manager for several(prenominal)(prenominal) \n promoteal areas. Full-time specialists, such as lawyers or treasurer, may likewise \nbe lay down in medium-sized firms, simply not in small ones. medium-sized companies \nare best served by flat organizational charts; that is, a couple of(prenominal) class-conscious \nlevels, with lead(a) managers account directly to the president. Murdick, \n bind off and Eckhouse recommend a span of management of at least(prenominal)(prenominal) six sight without \ncrossover responsibilities (22-23). \n larger-than-life companies usually have interlacing organizational structures that may \nhave any one of several one C forms. expectant companies are characterized by \n faculty and line personnel, with staff personnel providing support functions to \nline personnel, who are responsible for the corporations products or services. \n at that stead are change magnitude layers of management in large companies when equivalenced to \nmedium and small firms, and thither are often subdivisions or subsidiaries that \nare grouped under one large parent organization. Organizations may follow one of \nthe six stark(a) forms identified by the authors: battalion, product, geographic area, \nprocess, function or conformation of activity (33). Large companies are probable to \ncombine several of these forms. Organizational policies (as unconnected to personnel \nand staffing policies), crystalize upon discipline such as the principles to be \nfollowed in organizing the parts of the beau monde, relationships among major \norganizational components, guidelines for military post titles, utilitaria n \ndescriptions of components and spans of management. The authors end this chapter \nwith a handling of finale problems. such problems are identified as \nsituations that require action swinishd on executive nonplvictimization to pursue a given \n give of action (41) Chapter 4 formally introduces and explores a concept that \nhas been rudimentary in the text so far, scarce which the authors have not defined \nuntil now: strategic management. Murdick, fasten and Eckhouse identify heptad major \ntasks that form the strategic management process: preparedness of the philosophy \nof management, corporate purpose and goals; environmental epitome and forecast, \n cozy abbreviation of strengths and weaknesses; grammatical construction of schema; \nmilitary rating of strategy; carrying into action of strategy; and, strategic control (45). \nThe philosophy of management is pertain with what the firm strives to \ntouch in the long-term, not with immediate objectives. environ mental summary \nand forecast and upcoun study summary have already been covered in anterior \nchapters. Developing strategy is, along with implementing strategy, one of the \nmost conglomerate tasks a firm undertakes. The authors define strategy as \n\n1) a statement of strategic objectives of the organization, 2) courses of action \nto be taken in moving the organization from its present business office to a position \ndefined by its principal strategic objectives, and 3) policies and standards of \nconduct prosecute for one long cycle of the organization (46). \n\nWhen companies do not understand strategic management, in that respect is a notable geological fault \namong various tactical strategies. Such companies lack procedures for \ndeveloping strategies and plans, and may be carrying subsidiaries or products \nthat are no longer money- bladers. Companies requireing strategic management are \n probable to take in a loss of foodstuff share and a deteriorating capital position. \n snarf managers may powerfully disagree about the direction the firm is winning, or \nshould be taking. Finally, there is liable(predicate) to be no long-term, indite \nstrategic plan for the organization, including strategic goals and the shipway \nthose goals will be reached (46-48). \nMurdick, tie down and Eckhouse identify a 4-measure process to serve up \nformulate strategic directions for business. One, aggrandisement management must go under on \nthe reputation of the caller-up through open and heart-to-heart discourses. Two, \n epitome of the situation immaterial the company must be undertaken to see what \nopportunities and threats susceptibility be effected or overcome. Three, internal \n summary is necessity to determine resource and capability. Four, the internal \ncapabilities must be matched to the external opportunities (49). Murdick, Moor \nand Eckhouse similarly move to strategic planning and implementation, and bring up \nthat planning is, in fact, the dismayning of implementation. strategic plans \ninvolve penning down what is to be done, when, how, and by whom. Such plans \ngreatly enhance implementation by leaving few variables subject to chance. The \nauthors end the chapter with a line of merchandise of caution. They get wind that the best-made \nplans do no good unless they are implemented. Companies which may run \n efficiently may not be running harmonize to their strategic plan. Total company \ncontrol is necessary to long-term survival. They depute that long-term plans \n allow in identification of Key Performance Areas (KPAS) and the monitor system \nthat will nourish these areas on track with the strategic vision of top management \n(61). The authors let in leash appendices to this chapter, including key merger \nand learnedness terms, a discussion of value-based planning and a discussion of \ndiscounted bills flow military rating. \nIn chapter 5, Murdick, Moor and Eckhouse take up the complex issue of \nsurvival and prosperity among firms. While they admit that new firms have the \n superior risk of failure, they excessively level off out that old, embeded firms (such \nas Packard Motors and Baldwin Locomotive) underside excessively disappear from the business \nscene. In hostel to punter understand why some firms survive magical spell others fail, \nthe authors look at small, medium and large firms. They in like manner point out that \nthere are many more causes for failure than tin be covered in any one text, let \n wholly any one chapter. Beginning with small firms, Murdick, Moor and Eckhouse \n declare oneself that the competitive boundary that defines a companys survival be guardedly \nanalyzed. Small firms subscribe to to focus on facts rather than hunches and guesses. \nOwner-managers need to seek out qualified victor advice and take reformment \nof it. Growth for its own sake ineluctably to be bared, as does undercapitalization. \nLa ck of notes planning and managerial problems similarly iniquity small companies. \nMedium and large companies are grouped unitedly in the remainder of \nchapter 5 to examine why they succeed and fail. Here, the authors find that \n happy firms have written objectives and policies that cover all aspects of \na companys operations, including its internal and external environment (92). \nCompanies in this size category that fail almost unendingly have no unified sense of \ndirection (94). impuissance companies may suffer inadequacy in one or more key \n operable areas, or have people problems that bottom of the inningnot be overcome. These \ncompanies may not have good controls, or may try to implement too many controls \nat one time. Finally, medium and large companies that fail to operate with an \ninternational mentality may considerably find themselves facing unenviable times (100). \nChapter 6 contracts a four-part part on working(a) areas with a discussion of \n market . Here, Murdick, Moor and Eckhouse apprise that successful firms are \ncharacterized by ein truthone in the company world selling-oriented (103). They \n overly find that it is not tolerable for a company to understand the accomplishment of \n selling; a company and its merchandise staff must be able to understand the art, \nas well. Murdick, Moor and Eckhouse take a philosophical rather than mechanistic \n tone-beginning to market in request to provide the reader with a better base of \n savvy that can be applied in the real world. The authors first present \nthe thinking of a merchandising concept, which they define as a philosophy that guides \nthe attitude and look of each employee in the organization (104). special(prenominal) \ncharacteristics of the merchandising concept include treating the customer as all- \n burning(prenominal), pinpointing a target market, gaining a competitive edge, and commission \non sugar (105-106). \nMurdick, Moor and Eckhouse simila rly attempt to identify the characteristics \nof good marketers. They find that good marketers are those who can identify the \nkey factors associated with their business, see how those factors will \nperform in the future, and who can create large(p) strategies based on these \nfactors. costly marketers satiate a large number of customers at a high level of \nprofit over a long flow rate of time (at least ten years). Good marketers \nrecognize that selling is both an art and a science, and they shake up the best \nuse of scientific instruction in ordain to enhance the art. When examining the \n merchandise position of a company, it is necessary to analyze the trade \nphilosophy, policies, strategy and operations. Fundamentally, it is necessary \nto show that a company is following its trade concept. Broad selling \npolicies must be established. The marketing strategy of the company must be \nwell defined inside these broad policies. Finally, marketing operations must b e \ncarried out efficaciously and efficiently (109). Strategic marketing policies are \n essential by top managers working from top level marketing policies. Murdick, \nMoor and Eckhouse identify seven areas that may be covered by these strategic \nmarketing policies: faith and public service, products, markets, pelf, \n ad hominem selling, customer relations and advance (111) \nThe authors thus(prenominal)ce turn their attention to marketing policy and find that \nthere are three policy options within marketing: reach out sales into new classes \nof customers; attach sharpness in exist market segments; avoid marketing \ninnovations, hardly work to maintain present market share with product design and \nmanufacturing innovations. Murdick, Moor and Eckhouse are in like manner careful to \ndiscuss plans and tactics for keeping with the marketing concept and strategy. \nIn suggesting ways to analyze the marketing of an organization, the authors \nsuggest that companies strive to establish and maintain a competitive edge. \nMarketing research is of prime importance in mark that the company base its \ndirection on as much quantitative reading as possible. advertise and \nsales promotion policies must be grappleed in light of the companys customers, \n fabrication and other environmental factors. individualised selling must be taken into \naccount. Distribution and price strategies must be reviewed and modified on a \n constant basis in order to keep the company operating(a)(a) at supreme efficiency. The \nauthors conclude this chapter with a summary of the marketing mix as well as a \nsummary of the pitfalls that may be symptomatic of companies experiencing \nmarketing difficulty. \nChapter 7, which focuses on the functional area of business relationship and \nfinance, is the longest chapter in the book; it is nearly twice as long as any \nother chapter. This illustrates the importance that the authors place on \naccount and finance, and l ikewise the trembling they believe most readers have \nwhen it comes to these subjects. The authors concentrate on the prefatory aspects \nof finance and news report that can be learned apace and that will direct the \ngreatest benefit when taking a strategic approach to business. Three appendices \nprovide review substantial for those readers who feel they are lacking in some area. \nThe appendices cover business arithmetic, break-even analysis and definitions \nof explanation terms. Having accepted that there is perplexity and a general \nlack of encourage among business when confronted with method of accounting and finance, \nMurdick, Moor and Eckhouse discuss why it is important to understand fiscal \nanalysis. Chief among these reasons is the psyche that monetary analysis is the \nmost direct way to point out that a company may be experiencing difficulty. \nfiscal analysis can be apply to establish that there is a problem, though it \nmay not always establish what the root cause of the problem is. disdain the fact \nthat the authors remember pecuniary analysis to be key in reasonableness \ncompanies, they are also careful to point out the limitations of this type of \nanalysis. For example, there can be a tendency to use monetary analysis to \nfocus on the knightly, rather than anticipating what the historical figures may \n signalise about the future. in that location is also an essential danger in expecting past \n switch offs to accurately predict future ignores. \nTechnological changes, changes in consumer demand and other \nenvironmental factors that are outside the domain of pecuniary analysis can be \noverlooked if there is too much emphasis on historical monetary proceeding. \nHigh technology companies or those in rapidly expanding industries may have \nfinancial figures that are too uneven to provide an accurate picture of how the \ncompany is in reality performing. There is also the possibility that figures may \nno t (whether knowingly or not), accurately reflect the true position of the \ncompany. Finally, the authors suggest that financial analysis is an art that is \n know by all too few people for it to be conceptualiseed the ultimate analysis \ntool. \nHaving presented this rather prolonged discussion of the limitations of \nfinancial analysis, the authors then counter with an as drawn-out discussion \nof the advantages of using financial analysis. initiatory among these is the idea \nthat reduces do exist and financial analysis is one of the most effective methods \nfor spotting them. monetary analysis can also daub symptoms of problems \n(although not the fundamental cause, necessarily). Companies seeking \noutside capital to instill into the business find that potential investors \n hire financial analysis key to their decision-making process; inside \nmanagers would do well to keep a financial picture of the company in mind to \nprevent forbidding surprises. Since financia l analysis is quantitative, it can \n divine service point up where problems exist, rather than where managers may think they \nexist. Finally, and maybe most importantly, the authors suggest that slowness \ndifferent, max courses of action quantitatively provides additional tools \nto managers to make strategic decisions. \nThe authors then provide knowledge on how readers can obtain financial \n training. General sources, such as Moodys and bar & Poors are \ndiscussed as are ratio reports. Ratios are of item importance to the \nauthors; they pull four pages of a chart to figure ratios and a elongated \ndiscussion of their proper use. Murdick, Moor and Eckhouse respect comparing \nperformance across departments within a undivided organization, and across \ncompanies within a individual(a) industry in order to generate at the most accurate \n semblance. They note that when performing industry comparisons, it is \nimportant to compare like industries, and like companies within the industries. \nSelecting the impairment category can render the value of the ratio comparison null. \nAt this point, the authors parapraxis their focus from finance to accounting, \nand discuss how accounting can help decision-makers. Murdick, Moor and Eckhouse \nsuggest that financial accounting should answer cinque basic questions. One, how \nis the company doing overall? Two, when evaluating understudy plans, which is \nmost engaging? Three, what is going misuse? Where? How can it be fixed? \nFour, how can activities be coordinate? Five, is the company operating as \neffectively as it can in its environment (144-145)? Anticipating that readers \nare suspicious as to how to begin their analysis, the authors suggest that they \nbegin by taking financial information from the most new-made ten years. whatever \ntrends that exist over this period are likely to persist, according to the \nauthors, because trends generally do persist debar unforeseen circumstances. \nThe authors suggest that the reader consider four questions when examining the \nprofit and loss statement. One, what is the sales trend? Two, what is the \ntrend of cost of goods change as a percentage of sales? Three, whats the trend \nof operating expenses as a percentage of sales? Four, what is the trend in \nprofits? If the trend in sales is up, but the trend in profits is down, the \ncompany is very likely already in salutary trouble (147). returning(a) briefly to \nratio analysis at this point, the authors identify four key areas to examine: \nprofitability, liquidity, leverage and turnover. They also stress the \nimportance of considering any other pertinent questions that must be considered \nfor the specific company and industry. \nMurdick, Moor and Eckhouse consider break-even analysis to be important \nwhen: deciding whether to amplify sales or advertising expenses to increase \nvolume; weighing the relative merits of fall prices to increasing volume; \ndeterminin g the advisability of acceptance for capital improvements to increase \ncapacity; and when evaluating office automation. The first step in break-even \nanalysis, according to Murdick, Moor and Eckhouse, is dividing cost into fixed \n(constant) and variable. Murdick, Moor and Eckhouse give several examples of \ninventory military rating and the effect that changing valuation methods may have when \nconsidering a companys financial position. This discussion reminds the reader \nthat the valuation method or changing valuation may result in a company \noverstating or understating its actual position. The reader is then introduced \nto the pecuniary resource flow concept that establishes how many pecuniary resource are inevitable for \nprojects and the possible sources of those funds. The authors then discuss \nbudgets, which they consider to be of prime importance when evaluating a \ncompanys managerial performance.. Budgets assist in planning, but also indicate \nhow the firm has performed in the past. They indicate how well the company \nexpects to do, and how well the company has predicted their past performance. \nThey can also be used to spot difficulties and problem areas in the present, as \nwell as areas that became problems in the past. \nHaving presented a wealth of information to the reader on finance and \naccounting, the authors end the chapter with a protracted chart designed to help \nthe reader use his or her newly acquired skills. They also emphasize that it is \nthrough repeated and prevalent analysis that the reader is likely to improve his \nor her financial analysis skills, and the tools presented in the three \nappendices to this chapter are designed to assist in that improvement. Chapter 8 \nis concerned with the functional area of intersection. The authors begin this \nchapter by stating that the concepts they are putting forwards with regard to \nproduction apply equally to businesses that produce patent goods as well as \nthat provide service. Production, they suggest, is the process of converting \nany design of product or service into the actual product or service, (177). If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
Custom Paper Writing Service - Support ? 24/7 Online 1-855-422-5409. Order Custom Paper for the opportunity of assignment professional assistance right from the serene environment of your home. Affordable. 100% Original.'
No comments:
Post a Comment