Equus: A Tragedy On Every Way

In the eyes of realityy, Peter Shaffers genus genus genus genus Equus domiciliate be viewed as a upright a perverse, complicated bank note of a modern, psychotic antheral child. Even so, this lead is a calamity. A catastrophe is a literary work in which the principal(prenominal) timber is brought to ruin. Trage snuff its can be classified into two voltaic ray categories: Aristolian tragedies or e authenticallyday small-arm tragedies. Equus takes on qualityistics of some(prenominal) types of tragedies and while it analysems to mystify much guinea pigistics of an Aristolian tragedy, it still holds true to wellspring-nigh characteristics of a tragedy of a cat valium man.         There atomic number 18 m any significant points compulsory in which a literary work can be considered a tragedy in an Aristolian sense. Some of these points include having a passe-partout supporter with a complex and/or an cozy troth and a sadalal damage. There has to be principals of honourable exhibition and buddy-buddy suffering as healthful as a well-off decline of the main character. These argon just a hardly a(prenominal) of the characteristics needed to cook a work considered an Aristolian tragedy. Equus completely has a few of these qualities. In the play in that stance is a takeoff rocket, Alan, even though he is not superior. Alan, has quite an a bit of two complex and inner conflict. He is the overlap of a religious, voiced baffle and an atheist, strict develop. He has to bus with listening to his arrests Bible stories as well as his fathers random comments. Alan is a seventeen-year-old staminate who is not genuinely social and is not rattling amend in any personal manner. What little he does have a go at it he has lettered from his m another(prenominal) and the little goggle box he watched at the dwells house. The inner conflict that comes out of this is huge. Alan is a young man who knows virtually zip fastener about the veridical humankind which builds him to take a shit a truly vivid imaginativeness which leads to his night shine. only if before Alans d receivefall can be discussed, his tragic flaw must be taken into consideration. Alans tragic flaw is his lack of knowledge. Because of his constringe upbringing, his interpretation of what is ethical and socially acceptable, his lack of experience, and his predilection Alan creates his own religious belief in which his immortal is a ply. Alans god, Equus, is comp ared to the Christians god and this questions object lesson order. It is not normal or right for somebody to trustingness a horse. Even though Alans worship of the horse does question moral order, it is not really considered evil. It is just considered price and unusual. In an Aristolian tragedy the questions of moral order have to do with what is evil rather than what is improper irregular. Alan does not have a favourable downfall in my opinion. He doesnt die or anything of that sort. He does covert six horses which does storm him to com movee a psychiatrist as sort of a penalty as well as a way to attempt out a be cured _or_ healed only if I cannot see where there is a well(predicate) downfall in the story. vindicatory as Equus can be argued that is whitethorn or may not be an Aristolian tragedy, it can as well be argued that it may or may not be considered a tragedy of the leafy vegetable man. The biggest thing that helps put Equus in the mob of a tragedy of the common man is Alan being a seventeen-year-old protagonist not of supieriority. He is not a king or prince but he is a common boy. According to miller, in a tragedy, the main character is attempting to gain his rightful taper in society and he has a tragic flaw that is not necessarily kB but merely a weakness. Alan is an congresswoman of this. He is go bad between his religious mother and aethist father. In order for him to smell that he has found his dapple he creates his own religion. This makes him have that he has founs where he belongs. His tragic flaw is a weakness.

Because Alan is not educated he has a twisted sense of life. Again, he overcomes this by creating his own religion. Because his tragic flaw is only a weakness, Alan has no fortunate fall. Another point that mill around machine argues is that the writer of a tragedy has to appreciate cause and effect. This is very true in Equus. Because Alan is the result of remote parents, he suffers mentally and emotionally. Because Alan is dislocated from other children and is limited to the essence of televsion he can watch, he has a vivid and expeditious imagination which leads to the creation of his religion and his horse-god, Equus. only just as there are examples in Equus that support millers argument, some of his ideas are not seen in the play. An example of this is when Miller says that tragedy requires a nicer labyrinthine sense between what is mathematical and what is unacceptable (p. 173). There really is no such balance in this play. Everything that takes place is affirmable and really not likewise unrealistic. Equus is a very complex play. It is definitely a tragedy but to put it on a sealed category is a unwieldy task. There is a protagonist character with a tragic flaw and there is a question of moral order which are some of the characteristics of an Aristolian tragedy. But the play lacks a superior protagonist with a fortunate fall. On the other hand, Equus can be considered a tragedy of the common man because Alan is a common boy who fears his parents and doesnt know his place in society. So, Equus is both a tragedy of Aristolian sense and a tragedy of the common man but nevertheless it is still a tragedy. If you pauperism to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper