Georgia Lien Laws

In other instances, the everyday contractor or his subcontractors may use their spleen rights as a form of leverage during temporary construction disputes. It is e'er vital that the owner on a lower floorstand fully his or her rights under the irascibility statute as a way of passing exposure gener everyy and to defend against particular liens (Crewdson 76).

The term materialmen refers to all persons imparting the tools, appliances, machinery, or equipment included in the definition of materials under the gallium Code. That definition states that material "is aroundthing that goes into and becomes a part of the finished structure, such as lumber, nails, glass, hardware, etc., which is necessary to the completion of the building" (Georgia Code 44-14-360). The lien practice of law provides that certain persons "shall each have a extra lien on the real estate, factories, railroads, or other blank space for which they furnish labor, services, or materials" (Georgia Code 44-14-361):

1) mechanics of every affiliate who have taken no personal security for pee-pee done and material furnished in building, covering, or modify any real estate of their employers;

2) contractors, subcontractors, and materialmen who furnish material to subcontractors, and laborers who furnish labor to subcontractors, materialm

The scope of the materialman's lien statutes in Georgia were redefined in the case of Benning Construction co. v. Dykes pave & Construction Co. in 1992. In this case, the Georgia motor lodge of Appeals tested to decide which parties are entitled to a lien look at under the state's materialman's lien statutes. The first materialman's lien statute in Georgia was enacted in 1820 and provided liens to masons and master carpenters doing work in the city of Savannah. Another act was passed in 1834 extending these liens to other cities throughout the state. The law stated that all debts that were due to any mason or carpenter in the specified cities for building or repair work on a house would constitute an lode on the house.

The Georgia Legislature extended the act in 1837 to all counties in the state, and in 1861, the Georgia Supreme Court defined some of the terms in the statute. The code was revise several times (Yates 1404). Recent decisions, says Yates, affirm that the court intends to midriff an earlier liberalizing trend and to take a more conservative, unbending construction approach to lien statutes (Yates 1406).

While the mechanic's lien slackly comes second after a deed to secure debt, a lien claimant can let go priority by verbalise written lien waiver or by his or her conduct, though waiver is a matter of intent that must be demonstrated by some affirmative deport intention. The holder of a deed to secure debt may waive priority under one of four conditions:

Owners seek to value themselves from the consequences of Georgia's lien statute. The first instinct of an owner faced with a construction lien is to have it removed or fulfil immediately, and often a lender will exert military press on the owner to do just that. However, in some cases the removal of the lien may not be absolutely necessary, though the owner may want the psychological field pansy of having it removed anyway. The owner should first examine the lien for its inclemency under the Offici
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!